<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elite Mekupelet VS Cadbury Flake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/</link>
	<description>No ugly people were harmed making this blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Contienda de chocolates: Elite Mekupelet VS Cadbury Flake &#171; Moiblog por Moises Kirsch</title>
		<link>http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-202862</link>
		<dc:creator>Contienda de chocolates: Elite Mekupelet VS Cadbury Flake &#171; Moiblog por Moises Kirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-202862</guid>
		<description>[...] comparación entre 2 chocolates sumamente similares con el fin de descubrir cual es el mejor entre: un Elite Mekupelet y un Cadbury Flake ambos traidos desde el medio [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comparación entre 2 chocolates sumamente similares con el fin de descubrir cual es el mejor entre: un Elite Mekupelet y un Cadbury Flake ambos traidos desde el medio [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaffyChaffy</title>
		<link>http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-170382</link>
		<dc:creator>DaffyChaffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-170382</guid>
		<description>In my opinion the flake loses major points not only on texture (as you mentioned) but also in a category you forgot -- finish.  The flake has a terrible aftertaste reminiscent of the plastic wrapper.  Mekupelet leaves only a creamy sweet finish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion the flake loses major points not only on texture (as you mentioned) but also in a category you forgot &#8212; finish.  The flake has a terrible aftertaste reminiscent of the plastic wrapper.  Mekupelet leaves only a creamy sweet finish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Zumbe</title>
		<link>http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-65140</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Zumbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-65140</guid>
		<description>We are keen to purchase your flake for distribution in the EU.Can you
 please contact me. I am interested to see samples and prices.
 regards, Albert Zumbe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are keen to purchase your flake for distribution in the EU.Can you<br />
 please contact me. I am interested to see samples and prices.<br />
 regards, Albert Zumbe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomer Holmes</title>
		<link>http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-5720</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomer Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-5720</guid>
		<description>What was the expiration date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the expiration date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarai "Mekupelet" Melichar</title>
		<link>http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarai "Mekupelet" Melichar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 20:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>YOU SUCK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU SUCK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nisha</title>
		<link>http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>nisha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 19:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>I think you conviniently forgot that the 5 judges (excluding you) were specifically asked which chocolate they liked better and Flake won 3 to 2. I figured I should add in this "slight" detail to your report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you conviniently forgot that the 5 judges (excluding you) were specifically asked which chocolate they liked better and Flake won 3 to 2. I figured I should add in this &#8220;slight&#8221; detail to your report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jodi</title>
		<link>http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 06:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcos.kirsch.com.mx/2006/05/05/elite-mekupelet-vs-cadbury-flake/#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>LAME!  You made me wait for this?  Unsettled?  I don't believe that it was unsettled.  Hmmmm...  Looks like we're going to have to do a round two of this test here in H-town.  What do you say?

Jodi  ;-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LAME!  You made me wait for this?  Unsettled?  I don&#8217;t believe that it was unsettled.  Hmmmm&#8230;  Looks like we&#8217;re going to have to do a round two of this test here in H-town.  What do you say?</p>
<p>Jodi  ;-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
